Knowledge, attitudes, and practice related to the prone positioning of patients among intensive care unit nurses working in COVID-19 units: A cross-sectional study in China.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of studies persistently demonstrate that prone position ventilation can significantly improve the oxygenation index and blood oxygen saturation for most patients (70-80%) with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Studies have also shown that the awake prone position was both safe and effective in helping patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) breathe spontaneously. However, the prone position is not widely adopted when treating patients with COVID-19 or ARDS from other causes. Basic knowledge, positive attitudes, and correct practices among the nursing staff are necessary to increase the use of prone positions, reduce the incidence of complications associated with prone positions, and improve the quality and safety of health care. AIM: This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practice of prone positioning of patients among intensive care unit (ICU) nurses working in COVID-19 units and provide suggestions for improvement. STUDY DESIGN: ICU nurses were recruited from two designated tertiary hospitals for COVID-19 treatment in Shanghai, China, in April 2022, using convenience sampling. A questionnaire survey focusing on the dimensions of knowledge, attitudes, and practice of the prone position with 42 items, was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 132 ICU nurses participated. The scores on the overall questionnaire and the dimensions of knowledge, attitudes, and practice of prone position were 167.28 (95% CI, 161.70-172.86), 78.35 (95% CI, 76.04-80.66), 32.08 (95% CI, 31.51-32.65), and 56.85 (95% CI, 52.42-61.28) respectively. The overall average score was 79.66% (95% CI, 0.77-0.82). The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that prior experience in treating patients with COVID-19 and professional titles were related to the level of knowledge, attitudes, and practice of prone position. CONCLUSIONS: The ICU nurses strongly believed in the effectiveness of prone positioning, but their knowledge and practice levels need improvement. The experience in treating patients with COVID-19 and professional titles were related to the level of knowledge, attitudes, and practice of prone position. Nursing managers should ensure that ICU nurses are well trained in prone positioning and help enhance the knowledge and attitudes toward prone positioning to promote its widespread use. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Clinical guidelines and in-service training modules need to be developed to promote the use of prone positioning and reduce prone position-related complications.

Visual Analysis of Psychological Resilience Research Based on Web of Science Database.

Background: The importance of psychological resilience that people show in coping with stress and adversity is prominent, but few studies have used rigorous bibliometric tools to analyze the knowledge structure and distribution of psychological resilience research. Objective: The purpose of this study was to sort out and summarize the previous studies on psychological resilience by using bibliometrics. Specifically, the time distribution of psychological resilience research was determined by publication trend, the power distribution was determined by the distribution of countries, authors, institutions and journals, the hot research spots were analyzed according to the results of keyword cluster analysis, and the research frontier was explored according to the results of burst keywords. Methods: CiteSpace5.8.R3 was used to analyze the literatures on psychological resilience collected in Web of Science core Collection database from January 1, 2010, to June 16, 2022. Results: A total of 8462 literatures were included after screening. Research on psychological resilience has been on the rise in recent years. The United States had made a high contribution in this field. Robert H Pietrzak, George A Bonanno, Connor KM and others were highly influential. J Pers Soc Psychol has the highest citation frequency and centrality. The research hot spots focus on five aspects: study on psychological resilience related to COVID-19 pandemic, influencing factors of psychological resilience, psychological resilience related to PTSD, study on psychological resilience of special population, and the molecular biology and genetic basis of psychological resilience. Psychological resilience related to COVID-19 pandemic was the most cutting-edge research aspect. Conclusion: The current situation and trend of psychological resilience research were found in this study, which may be used to identify more hot issues and explore new research directions in this field.

Self-gated 3D stack-of-spirals UTE pulmonary imaging at 0.55T.

PURPOSE: To develop an isotropic high-resolution stack-of-spirals UTE sequence for pulmonary imaging at 0.55 Tesla by leveraging a combination of robust respiratory-binning, trajectory correction, and concomitant-field corrections. METHODS: A stack-of-spirals golden-angle UTE sequence was used to continuously acquire data for 15.5 minutes. The data was binned to a stable respiratory phase based on superoinferior readout self-navigator signals. Corrections for trajectory errors and concomitant field artifacts, along with image reconstruction with conjugate gradient SENSE, were performed inline within the Gadgetron framework. Finally, data were retrospectively reconstructed to simulate scan times of 5, 8.5, and 12 minutes. Image quality was assessed using signal-to-noise, image sharpness, and qualitative reader scores. The technique was evaluated in healthy volunteers, patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection, and patients with lung nodules. RESULTS: The technique provided diagnostic quality images with parenchymal lung SNR of 3.18 ± 0.0.60, 4.57 ± 0.87, 5.45 ± 1.02, and 5.89 ± 1.28 for scan times of 5, 8.5, 12, and 15.5 minutes, respectively. The respiratory binning technique resulted in significantly sharper images (p < 0.001) as measured with relative maximum derivative at the diaphragm. Concomitant field corrections visibly improved sharpness of anatomical structures away from iso-center. The image quality was maintained with a slight loss in SNR for simulated scan times down to 8.5 minutes. Inline image reconstruction and artifact correction were achieved in <5 minutes. CONCLUSION: The proposed pulmonary imaging technique combined efficient stack-of-spirals imaging with robust respiratory binning, concomitant field correction, and trajectory correction to generate diagnostic quality images with 1.75 mm isotropic resolution in 8.5 minutes on a high-performance 0.55 Tesla system.

Cardiac Arrhythmia after COVID-19 Vaccination versus Non-COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (preprint)

Aims: Cardiac arrhythmia is a rare complication after vaccination. Recently, reports of arrhythmia after COVID-19 vaccination have increased. Whether the risk for cardiac arrhythmia is higher with COVID-19 vaccines than with non-COVID-19 vaccines remains controversial. This meta-analysis explored the incidence of arrhythmia after COVID-19 vaccination and compared it with the incidence of arrhythmia after non-COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for English-language studies reporting the incidence of arrhythmia (the primary endpoint) after vaccination from January 1, 1947 to October 28, 2022. Secondary endpoints included incidence of tachyarrhythmia and all-cause mortality. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the incidence of arrhythmia by age (children [<18 years] versus adults [[≥]18 years]), vaccine type (mRNA COVID-19 vaccine versus non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccine; individual non-COVID-19 vaccines versus COVID-19 vaccine), and COVID-19 vaccine dose (first versus second versus third). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed, and the intrastudy risk for bias and the certainty of evidence were evaluated. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022365912). Results: The overall incidence of arrhythmia from 36 studies (1,528,459,662 vaccine doses) was 291.8 (95% CI 111.6-762.7) cases per million doses. The incidence of arrhythmia was significantly higher after COVID-19 vaccination (2263.4 [875.4-5839.2] cases per million doses; 830,585,553 doses, 23 studies) than after non-COVID-19 vaccination (9.9 [1.3-75.5] cases per million doses; 697,874,109 doses, 14 studies; P<0.01). Compared with COVID-19 vaccines, the influenza, pertussis, human papillomavirus, and acellular pertussis vaccines were associated with a significantly lower incidence of arrhythmia. The incidence of tachyarrhythmia was significantly higher after COVID-19 vaccination (4367.5 [1535.2-12,360.8] cases per million doses; 1,208,656 doses, 15 studies) than after non-COVID-19 vaccination (25.8 [4.5-149.4] cases per million doses; 179,822,553 doses, 11 studies; P<0.01). Arrhythmia was also more frequent after the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine (19,064.3 [5775.5-61,051.2] cases per million doses; 7968 doses, 3 studies) than after the first dose (3450.9 [988.2-11,977.6] cases per million doses; 41,714,762 doses, 12 studies; P=0.05) or second dose (2262.5 [2205.9-2320.7] cases per million doses; 34,540,749 doses, 10 studies; P<0.01). All-cause mortality was comparable between the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 vaccination groups. Conclusions: The overall risk for arrhythmia after COVID-19 vaccination was relatively low, although it was higher in COVID-19 vaccine recipients than in non-COVID-19 vaccine recipients. This increased risk should be evaluated along with other important factors, such as the incidence of local outbreaks and the risk for arrhythmia due to COVID infection itself, when weighing the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.